Search for: "United States v. Am" Results 2721 - 2740 of 7,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm by Amy Howe
United States Monday, December 4 Christie v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
The reasons for this phenomenon are addressed below.First, examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark Office are given very little time to issue Actions on what are often very complex and detailed patent applications. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
 I am keeping my ears opened about whether this termination is challenged in or out of court. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am by Colin Murray
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:43 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In United States of America, for the use of Precision Air Conditioning of Brevard Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Department of State consulate abroad for an immigrant visa in order to come to the United States and be admitted as a permanent resident. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 5:03 am
.;09 Civ. 1266 (PAC);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (AM) v DPP; R (AM) v DPP; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:13 am by Eric Segall
My name is Eric Segall, and I represent the United States Department of Education in this matter. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]