Search for: "X, Y "
Results 2721 - 2740
of 4,307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 8:53 am
., a country's parliament might pass a new law on June 1, 2010 to the effect that a given law (passed in 1950) has always meant X rather than Y, and this indeed would ostensibly nail down that, even back in 1950, it did indeed mean X not Y. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 11:55 am
The point of the clause is that Senate cannot do Z, not that it must do X before it can do Y. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:00 am
They have made an impact on [COMPANY NAME] by [X, Y AND Z]. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:41 am
Thus, instead of the bland and neutral, “the evidence will show” x and y, you must say something like, “I will prove” x and y. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm
We could not do X, so then the bank refused to do Y. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:14 am
We of course were talking about particular trial court judges, and not the anonymous Judges X, Y, and Z. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 1:38 pm
In others, it might merely indicate that X "caused" Y in the purely empirical sense that Y could not have happened without it, even if X doesn't bear any moral responsibility. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:50 pm
The expression that X causes Y, or that X causes this particular case of Y, “has no empirical meaning and is simply a mantra repeated by experts for purposes of legal decision makers who similarly have no idea what it means. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
Furthermore, the Romanian procedure cannot be considered compatible with EU law, as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights X. and Y. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm
So there's not a huge risk of forum-shopping or unjust discrimination if the federal court says X but a state court feels the right answer is Y. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm
X. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:06 am
He receives $Y in income and pays $y in taxes. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 1:39 am
If the Supreme Court interprets a statute to mean X, and Congress thinks it should have been interpreted to mean Y, then when Congress re-writes and re-enacts the statute to say Y, the Courts treat this as a change in the meaning of the statute, rather than as a substitution of one reading for another. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
A bonus might provide for an extra $X per week of service or an extra $Y per hour. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:42 pm
On the X-Axis is Liberty. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
Claim 1 of this request read:Use of a silicate compound of the formula KuNavAlwCaxMgySiOz wherein […] u, v and w, independently range from about 0 to about 0.5; x and y independently range from about 0.1 to about 0.6; and z is a value which balances the formula; in a method for preparing a glass composition, said method comprising forming a batch of glass-forming components by admixing the said silicate; a volatile component source containing a volatile selected from the… [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 10:24 pm
The fact that the Constitution protects a constitutional right to do X when it serves interest Y does not mean that there is a constitutional right to serve interest Y unrelated to X. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:17 pm
Science for Lawyers By Eric Y. [read post]
7 May 2008, 11:28 am
If hypothetical defendant X harasses victim Y by sending Y 1,000 harassing emails, is that 1 crime (single victim harassed = one crime) or 1,000 crimes (1,000 discrete acts of harassment = 1,000 crimes)? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:15 am
(There are some exceptions, for instance if you’re trying to put on a debate about the policies of Administration X and you want people who served both in Administration X and in the ideologically opposite Administration Y, but this doesn’t seem to be what happened here.) [read post]
