Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 2741 - 2760 of 5,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2013, 6:53 am by Schachtman
  An IARC classification of 2A will not help a plaintiff reach the jury because it does not connote more likely than not. [read post]
11 May 2013, 1:38 pm
At paras. 39 and 40 he wrote:[39]      R. 57(9) provides that costs of and incidental to a proceeding shall follow the event unless the court otherwise orders. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is to be noted in this context that this assertion does not correspond to the content of the client’s letter because it does not contain any indications on the scope of the patent protection to be obtained […]. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:23 am by Florian Mueller
In paragraph 1 it proposes a distinction between NPEs and PAEs that I hadn't seen before -- these terms are synonyms. [read post]
2 May 2013, 3:22 pm
The House voted 110-6 to pass the ban, while the Senate voted 39-1 to approve the bill that the House had amended. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 3:16 pm by TWiT
Thanks to Cachefly for the bandwidth for this show.Photo credit: muohace_dcRunning time: 1:49:39Running time:: 1:49:39 [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:47 pm by Lindsey Tonsager
  (FAQ 39)  This guidance builds on a blog post published by the FTC's Chief Technologist, Steve Bellovin. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:40 am by Andres
In this issue: (2013) 10:1 SCRIPTed 1-139 Issue DOI: 10.2966/scrip.100113 Cover Post-mortem PrivacyNayha Sethi Editorial Post Mortem Privacy Lilian Edwards, pp.1-6 | HTML | PDF | Dedicated Section on Post Mortem Privacy Access to the Digital Self in Life and Death: Privacy in the Context of Posthumously Persistent Facebook Profiles Elaine Kasket, pp.7-18 | HTML | PDF | Does the EU Data Protection Regime Protect Post-Mortem Privacy and What Could Be The Potential… [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:38 am by Dan Harris
Customs classification — under which category of the HTSUS does the good fall? [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:37 am
Among the 39 States with a text messaging ban, only 3 have made a violation of the law a secondary offense. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:13 am by Ken
Steele repeats the same themes as his colleagues, and cites many of the same authorities, but does so more forcefully. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 3:57 pm by Ken
(ECF 69-1, pp. 21:18-2, 38:22-39:15, 40:8-12.) [read post]