Search for: "Does 1-80"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 6,387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2017, 8:08 am
When they do apply, an accused has a right to have one, as does the Crown. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:16 pm
This Friday’s Five is the first of two posts on employer’s obligations to conduct prompt and effective investigations into harassment complaints. 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:05 pm
Santorelli, 80 N.Y.2d 875, 600 N.E.2d 232 (1992). [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:49 am
It does not seem likely. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 8:12 am
In 2015, another bill aimed at banning texting and driving (House Bill 80) was introduced. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
The defence of fair comment, however, does require specific elements: 1) the opinion must be on a matter of true public interest and not just prurient; 2) it must be a based on provable facts; 3) if there are inferences of fact, they must be recognizable as comment; 4) there must be no actual or express malice; and 5) while not everyone has to agree with the opinion, it must be one someone could honestly express based on the facts. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
I Social media, "WikiLeaks" and false news in the 18th century: Thomas Jefferson and the "Mazzei letter" I Does the economic impact of SPCs necessitate SPC Regulation reform? [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm
” [3] As one noted expert observed, summarizing the history of these bacteria and their significance for public health: Although L. monocytogenes was recognized as an animal pathogen over 80 years ago, the first outbreak confirming an indirect transmission from animals to humans was reported only in 1983, in Canada’s Maritime provinces. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
Nor does the fact that a given counsel had previously been used give rise to any conflict of interest. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:52 am
Rule 80 EPCThe appellant argues that the requirements of Rule 80 EPC are not met, because it is not apparent which ground for opposition has occasioned the amendments contained in the main request.The board disagrees.Claims 1 and 6 have been restricted in order to exclude embodiments in which the motor [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
These vaccines provide long-term protection against HAV infection.[6] Hepatitis A is the only common vaccine-preventable foodborne disease in the United States.[7] This virus is one of five human hepatitis viruses that primarily infect the human liver and cause human illness.[8] Unlike hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A does not develop into chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which are both potentially fatal conditions.[9] Nonetheless, infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV) can lead to acute… [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm
Information available at this time does not indicate an ongoing risk of hepatitis A virus infection at Tropical Smoothie Cafes. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:39 am
– 1:45 p.m. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
There are two chief exceptions to this rule: 1) when the contract has an anti-assignment clause or 2) when there is regulatory issue that prevents assignment. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 12:26 pm
., 318 U.S. 80 (1943).The PTAB decision was inadequate:The Board’s decision here is inadequate. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:13 am
In my view, as such, they do not fall within the meaning of the word “disbursements” in the context of a costs rule. [80] It will be apparent that the conclusion I have reached does not depend on limiting the applicability of the word “disbursements” by reference to the phrase “incurred in the conduct of the proceeding”. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm
Introduction The existence of racism in our legal system is no surprise. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 11:52 am
For example, 100% has the same width as 199%, but not the same as 200% ("2" is wider than "1").A triple-digit percentage with a "1" (all other numbers are wider) in the beginning looks like the most probable scenario. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
Hill and the Union appealed, and in a 2-1 decision authored by Judge Eileen A. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
If a review does take place, your medical records are the focus of the review, rather than your trial work. [read post]
