Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 2741 - 2760 of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm by Buce
 And on this basis, you can understand it as of a piece with the other anti-war play, Henry V--just Henry V carried remorselessly to its logical conclusion.The Ashland Henry V is not exactly a top-of-the-chart presentation: good enough, but you could wish for better. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 6:58 am by Odia Kagan
The European Data Protection Board has issued draft guidelines on the interplay between Art 3.2 and Chapter V of GDPR. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The trial judge held that he was bound to follow the approach adopted by the House of Lords in the cases of Cookson v Knowles [1979] AC 556 and Graham v Dodds [1983] 1 WLR 808 and to calculate the multiplier from the date of death. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:32 am by Tejinder Singh
As almost all Americans who have ever watched television or gone to a movie know, the Supreme Court held in a case called Miranda v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:44 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had two posts (access those from here and here) on the RNRL v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the High Court[1] Mr Justice Cooke referred to the case of Barker v Corus UK Ltd[2] and found that IEG’s liability in any given year of the policy was for the wrongful exposure to risk which was created in that year. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 6:04 am by Dennis Crouch
As mentioned above, the question of enablement was given to the jury. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Zachary Spilman
Appellant proposed instructions for the Article 128 offense and did not object to the instructions given by the military judge. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 12:15 am
On Friday, a two-judge panel of the High Court of Justice decided R (Saadoon & Mufdhi) v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:21 am by Howard Wasserman
Given my limited knowledge of the details of Title VII, I will not delve too deep into the details of either  Vance v. [read post]