Search for: "I v. B" Results 2741 - 2760 of 24,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am by J
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:51 am by Susan Brenner
  As Wikipedia explains, and as I have noted in prior posts, the Rule 12(b)(6) motion, which replaced the common law demurrer, is how lawsuits with insufficient legal theories underlying their cause of action are dismissed from court. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 3:21 am
Loss causation is one of the elements that have to be satisfied in a securities fraud action under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. [1] The Supreme Court in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Not for the first time, I (and I suspect others) have been completely wrong-footed by Baroness Hale. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 11:27 am
A few months ago I did a post on a case from Wisconsin: State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
 SPCs provide an additional period of protection - up to a maximum of 5 years - for a product (i) subject to a valid MA at the date of the application (Article 3(b)) and protected by a patent (basic patent) in force at the date of the application (Article 3(a)). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
 So it is with slight delay that the IPKat comes to the latest decision in the apparently endless Hospira v Genentech saga. [read post]