Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE" Results 2741 - 2760 of 40,606
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:49 am by SHG
Back when Chief Justice John Roberts questioned how diversity would contribute an educational benefit to physics during oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
”[v]The release does not explain what such a response would entail, which is not surprising given that the SEC is neither equipped nor authorized to tell private funds how to manage their risks, let alone to rescue private funds in times of stress. [read post]
2 May 2023, 1:43 pm
This desire to keep my professional work and blogging separate also was a large factor in what became my main research focuses: constitutional law and criminal law. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:39 am by Bright!Tax Writers
Some highlights include: Touring coffee plantations in the Coffee Axis region Visiting the Catedral de Sal de Zipaquirá, a cathedral located in an underground salt mine Exploring national parks like Tayrona, Serranía de la Macarena, & Chiribiquete Going island hopping off the Caribbean coast Discovering ancient ruins in San Agustín Archaeological Park & Ciudad Perdida (“Lost City”) Visiting museums like the National Museum, Gold Museum,… [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:29 am by Brianna Mayes
If neither condition is met, the TSX will consider the following factors to determine whether the Voting Agreement has a material effect on the control of the issuer: the term of the Voting Agreement (including whether it is time-limited or transaction-based); whether the Voting Agreement creates a large enough block to influence vote outcome (which could be as low as 10% but is typically more than 20%); the context of the Voting Agreement; and the consequences if a security holder breaches… [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Over the past several years, the use of non-disclosure agreements (“NDAs”) has received significant public scrutiny following their controversial use in a number of high profile harassment claims.[1] NDAs were back in the headlines earlier this year following the leak to the Telegraph of around 100,000 Whatsapp messages belonging to the former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock.[2] The messages, which revealed Mr Hancock’s communications with other members of the government during… [read post]