Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Schwartz – Section Vice Chair, Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP PLENARY SESSION #1, 9:15 a.m. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
Lord Judge was supportive of Lord Justice Leveson and of the Press Complaints Commission, both targets of criticism in the context of the inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press and the Leveson inquiry. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am
See Ralph Klier v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:32 am
The father appealed against that decision.Held: Giving the leading judgment, Lord Justice Pill said (at paragraph 7) that the primary issue was the meaning and effect of paragraph 16(1)(b) of Schedule 1 to the Child Support Act 1991, which states that a maintenance assessment will cease to have effect "on there no longer being any qualifying child with respect to whom it would have effect". [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am
v=43f2bBjGi_8 Now, that’s quite a quirky repertory, and it stands in favorable comparison to Tom’s: the periodic table, plagiarism, pollution, the new math, the Vatican II conference, and of course the silent letter ‘e’. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Ad [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:03 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play 9/11 ten years on Even more secret evidence for government in Al Rawi case Mutual confidentiality between intelligence services trumped by open justice requirements [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Theresa May’s #Catflapgate earned the derision of Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor Ken Clarke who described her example of the Human Rights Act in operation – and she was not making it up – as ‘laughable and childlike’. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am
“This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am
This week saw the third of Lord Justice Leveson’s seminar series. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
(credit for 1997 map of Central Africa) It made no mention, however, of the fact Kony's the target of an ICC arrest warrant that was issued in 2005 and thereafter became the subject of frequent "peace v. justice" debates.A remarkable move, particularly for a state not party to the ICC treaty. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359). [read post]
