Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 5,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
Well, last month marked a significant milestone in the work to turn the UPC Agreement into a functioning court as the Preparatory Committee took some of the last of the key framework decisions to shape the Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:44 am
By contrast, Not as good as one may think. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm
Good question! [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
., C. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 3:59 am
Back in 2008, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) first addressed that topic in Adidas Case C-102/07 [noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:47 am
So far so good, but where do they go in Chapter 73? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:45 am
It pointed to five third-party registrations, but the Board agreed with Examining Attorney Andrew C. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:56 am
First, stuff, the thing law has been most concerned with—works, marks, inventions. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Mark McKenna: Who counts as a user? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm
TRIPS + Lanham Act both define marks broadly—anything capable of distinguishing goods/services. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Any effect of anticipation from C&D letters? [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins issued the following statement on Saturday, February 13th: CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 13 FEBRUARY 2016 Good evening. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
A federal prosecutor would need to prove that a dealer actually knew an object was stolen, but a state prosecutor may simply need to prove that a dealer had reason to believe that an artifact had been stolen, which is a much lower legal burden.More importantly, almost one quarter of the states have a built-in legal assumption that a dealer in goods is presumed to know an object was stolen when (a) the dealer did not reasonably gather information about whether the… [read post]
Save the Date: the Importance of the Date of First Use in Canadian Trade-mark Applications (for now)
16 Feb 2016, 5:30 am
However, the Opposition Board instead agreed with the Opponent’s submission that while the invoice was dated October 28, 2011 and goods were shipped to Canada from Chile on that date, the approximate date of arrival in Canada of those goods was not until January 26, 2012. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
The judges who made the orders genuinely thought the orders were in their best interest, made in good faith and after conscientious application of s1 Children Act 1989 (in which the welfare of children is paramount). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In Bongrain SA’s Trade Mark Application [2004] EWCA Civ 1690 at [26]-[28], Jacobs LJ had, interpreting various European case law including Joined Cases C-456/01P and C-457/01 P Henkel v OHIM EU:C:2004:258, rejected the idea that a “fancy” or unusual shape of goods would automatically be taken by the public as a trade mark denoting trade origin. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 2:48 am
Applicant argued that the mark as a whole "has no meaning," and that "the Board has approved marks that convey more about the respective goods or services than does Applicant's mark. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:55 am
., MDL No. 2272, Master Docket No. 11 C 5468, No. 12 C 6279, 2015 WL 5050214 (N.D. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:07 am
See TBMP Sections 405.04(b), 406.04(c), and 410. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 12:10 pm
This is so on consideration: (1) of their increasing availability, now also by means of dedicated buttons; and (2) that there are entire news portals that provide daily good journalism also by using GIFs as a visual aid.In the recent past the NFL has submitted takedown requests to Twitter over allegedly-infringing GIFs, although some commentators have concluded that - even if likely to fall within the scope of copyright protection - under US law GIF-providers would be likely shielded… [read post]
