Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 2741 - 2760
of 21,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 9:01 am
Scott hearkened back to object lessons of yesteryear to mark the release of two new comedies that have literally been decades in the making: Party Down and A History of the World, Part 2. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:20 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
S., at 315 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 5:16 am
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:08 am
Oral argument for Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:15 am
The consensus is that no “presumption [of validity] arises from a pending application to register a mark,” Aspen Grove, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:12 am
Andrusiek v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
Telefonos de Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:55 pm
Heinz Company v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:18 am
The Secretariat then presents the request to the Assemblies of the Member States for approval. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am
A proprietor can oppose the further commercialisation of pharmaceutical products imported from another Member State in its original internal and external packaging with an additional external label applied by the importer, unless:(i) it is established that the use of the trade mark rights by the proprietor thereof to oppose the marketing of the relabelled products under that trade mark would contribute to the artificial partitioning of the markets between Member… [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am
A proprietor can oppose the further commercialisation of pharmaceutical products imported from another Member State in its original internal and external packaging with an additional external label applied by the importer, unless:(i) it is established that the use of the trade mark rights by the proprietor thereof to oppose the marketing of the relabelled products under that trade mark would contribute to the artificial partitioning of the markets between Member… [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:34 am
Dragon Bleu (SARL) v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
Stawski claimed rights to his marks in nine states, as an exception to John Gregory Lawson's registration for the mark PROSPER for wines, but Stawski failed to show prior, lawful use of his marks (and he also failed to prove that confusion is not likely). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Following Buck v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Following Buck v. [read post]
