Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 2741 - 2760 of 10,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2019, 4:25 am by SHG
They could identify excess sentences all day long, but they can’t correct them, reduce them, change them in any way. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that “[t]he order … could be the end of the misconduct controversy as the decision upheld the conclusion of a special panel of judges from the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:46 am by Jason Shinn
” If you need a refresher course on what consideration is and why it matters, we’ve got you covered. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:46 am by Jason Shinn
” If you need a refresher course on what consideration is and why it matters, we’ve got you covered. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
They contended that "[t]he ability to sue to enjoin unconstitutional actions by state and federal officers is the creation of courts of equity, and reflects a long history of judicial review of illegal executive action, tracing back to England. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm by Arshan Barzani
Is the kaiser’s abortive trial merely a dead evolutionary branch in the history of international law—or does it still matter? [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:09 am by David Priess
More recently, during the July 24 public testimony of Robert Mueller, Ratcliffe stood out due to his full-throated criticisms of the former special counsel’s office, its investigation, and its findings. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
Democrats had harsh words for the president during Robert Mueller’s appearance before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:53 am
But there is a difference that could matter: In 1974, the full House had voted to declare an impeachment inquiry opened.... [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:56 am by SHG
If they can convince you, convince a nation, they can put this matter to rest. [read post]
  He wasn’t baited into speculating about matters that went beyond the ambit of his investigation. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by Helen Alvare
Kavanaugh’s careful dissent from the court’s stay of Louisiana’s admitting-privileges law is the dog that didn’t bark. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Chief Justice Roberts rewrote the individual mandate and Medicaid expansion. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am by David A. Martin
Roberts does not suggest that his analysis applies only to domestic matters, though full pretext scrutiny in national security cases may be a tougher sell. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:44 am by Sandy Levinson
 See, e.g., the shouting match between Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Breyer about Brown in Parents Involved (where I believe Breyer was clearly correct, for what that’s worth). [read post]