Search for: "People v High"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 15,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
Some people say it’s degrading. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:20 am
High Court Eliminates Standing Requirements for Consumer Protection Lawsuits, Threatening Flood of Abusive Litigation, vol. 9, no. 20, Mealey's Litigation Report: Class Actions (Dec. 17, 2009) (discussing Grayson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:18 am
The case is Wetzel v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
As a result of the vague standards set out in the statute the courts have developed a test to determine whether a nonprofit hospital is entitled to tax exemption.[7] The test was first articulated in Methodist Old Peoples Home v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 2:18 pm
" (Van Natta v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital and Botham (FC) v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58 – read judgment. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:04 am
That’s because the High Court started its new term right off the bat with two big criminal cases: Collins v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
The Court emphasized the high level of deference that federal habeas courts must show to state-court decisions on the merits, particularly state-court decisions rejecting Jackson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
-->-->*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->BY MARC BOURGEOISAntonio FrankoWednesday's first witness was Antonio Franko, a high school friend of Joels. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:38 pm
In sum, the term refers to the Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 4:23 am
In the work comp world, a prime example is pending before the California Supreme Court in the Stevens v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 6:15 am
See also related discussion list posting.UNHCR Reiterates the Importance of Eradication of Statelessness in Ukraine (UNHCR, Nov. 2018) [text via ReliefWeb]UNHCR Welcomes Spain and Haiti Move to Counter Statelessness (UNHCR, Sept. 2018) [text]- Both countries recently took action to accede to one or both of the statelessness conventions.Blog posts:Chasing Shadows: Making Statelessness Visible in Poland (ENS Blog, Sept. 2018) [text]Court of Appeal Says Statelessness Must be Proved on Balance of… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:24 am
REFOCUS is made up of 10 people with experience of mental illness, and ten people who had family members who used the services. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:45 am
From People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:38 pm
In sum, the term refers to the Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:24 am
REFOCUS is made up of 10 people with experience of mental illness, and ten people who had family members who used the services. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
” The Court’s decision, in Hewitt v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:21 am
Justice Birss of the UK’s High Court of Justice in Unwired Planet International Ltd. v Huawei Technologies Co. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:19 pm
Snarecroft Ltd v Quantum Securities Ltd (2018) EWHC 2071 (Ch) This is a High Court decision from February, but it has just appeared on Bailii. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 3:53 pm
While I think that even it is constitutionally protected (there's no established First Amendment exception that covers it), I have to agree that little would be lost to public debate if people couldn't publicly insult high school students' appearance, and say that they ought to have been killed. [read post]
