Search for: "People v Word" Results 2741 - 2760 of 17,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 8:45 pm
Would we uphold the warning just because it contained the magic words, 'You have the right to an attorney'? [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am by SHG
In yet another decision demonstrating that a judge whose career was spent prosecuting can show the fortitude to suppress, Brooklyn Justice Mark Dwyer rejected the testimony of NYC Police Officer Robert McNamara, who falsely claimed consent to justify a search of an apartment to locate a weapon.In People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:06 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: We the People: Petitioning President Obama to end software patents (Patently-O) (Ars Technica) STOP Online Piracy Act starts war of words (1709 Copyright Blog) (IP Watch) (Ars Technica) (Public Knowledge) (EFF) (EFF) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) US Marshals turned loose to collect $63,720.80 from Righthaven (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) Tenenbaum demands rehearing of $675,000 RIAA file-sharing case (TorrentFreak) (Recording Industry vs… [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Marc DeGirolami
The post Traditionalism Rising, Part V: The Problem of Politics appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 3:40 pm
The hapless Egyptologists' readings of Old Kingdom hieroglyphs in Egypt involving words having an Indo-European substratum remain a source of great vexation to this writer.A typical example are the hieroglyphs which the Egyptologists read aswdj-uror aswadj weras the ancient Pharaonic name for the Mediterranean Sea.The Egyptologists erroneously translate those hieroglyphs as"The Great Green"as the alleged Pharaonic name for the Mediterranean,but of course,that is a… [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 2:24 pm by lennyesq
This holding conflicts with a recent ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court, People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 9:07 am
Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 529 (1987) (holding in the context of the invocation of the right to counsel that “[i]nterpretation is only required where the defendant's words, understood as ordinary people would understand them, are ambiguous”). [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:59 am by Venkat Balasubramani
California’s constitution limits the rights of some property owners to exclude people. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:56 am
People have likely spoken about it as a great way to alternatively resolve seemingly intractable personal problems. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I write these words, the Supreme Court is being inundated with amicus briefs on both sides of the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases (more than four dozen, as of 6:00 p.m., with many more to come). [read post]