Search for: "Session v. State"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 6,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
The letter states: As Attorney General of the United States, I have a duty to defend the Constitution and to faithfully execute the laws passed by Congress. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
And in Olympic Holding Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:30 am
Sessions not so much. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:30 am
Sessions not so much. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:54 am
In the decision – Deputy Chief Counsel for the Public Defender Division of CPCS v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:59 pm
Michael Simko handled the case pro bono and attributed the loss to a lack of witnesses to back his client's claims and the state's failure to approve a transgender discrimination law in the past three legislative sessions. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:51 am
In Holloway v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Michigan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 5:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
I always enjoy these sessions--and I'm especially pleased to be doing this one in person after three years of Zooming. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:35 am
A post yesterday described this new redistricting dispute (Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:01 pm
James highlighted the case of DuPont v Kolon - which concerned the Kevlar trade secrets (read about the case here in the testimony from Karen Cochran) - and recent cases concerning Chinese espionage (US v Xu and Zi, US v Xi and US v Chen) as examples of criminal trade secrets prosecution. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm
The bill as it now stands, demonstrates a legislative intent to construe that provision as retroactive.' (McKinney's Session Laws 1968, ch. 700, p. 2308; see LeClaire v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 2:19 pm
As a public employer, your actions are considered the actions of the government or the “state. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:13 pm
A debate over the legacy of Lochner v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:40 am
But NLRB v. [read post]