Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 2741 - 2760
of 10,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Bowman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:35 pm
§ 41.50(B)(2). [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
§ 408(a), (b). [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 6:32 am
" ACLU brief in Koontz v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 8:33 am
§ 9003(e)(2)(B). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
What about Rule 4(e)(2)(B)? [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Furthermore, in deciding the question of whether a bona fide emergency declaration has been made, the decision last spring in Trump v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am
Logistic Regression: A state-of-the-art supervised learning algorithm for machine learning that estimates the probability that a document is relevant, based on the features that it contai [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 10:42 am
See P.L. 114-153 § 2(e). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
(Report of the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights 19 Dec. 2018)The Report may be accessed HERE in multiple languages: HRC 40th 19/12/2018A/HRC/40/57 Guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms - Report of the Independent Expert on the… [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Supreme Court precedent, and with precedent from appellate courts in other states. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm
-signed international free trade agreements; and (4) products covered by other FAR and DFARS exceptions to the BAA, including: (i) the public interest (FAR 25.103(a)); (ii) domestic non-availability determinations (FAR 25.103(b)); (iii) where the government would pay an unreasonably high cost for the domestic end product (FAR 25.103(c)); (iv) commissary resale (FAR 25.103(d)); and (v) purchases of commercial information technology (FAR 25.103(e)). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
” Conspicuously absent from this portion of the opinion’s discussion is any mention of the legislative intent underlying the 90-day filing and service statute of limitations of Government Code § 65009(c)(1), its plain language stating it applies to bar “all persons” from “any further action or proceeding” after it expires (§ 65009(e)), and its expressly stated intent not to displace shorter statutes of limitations. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
PTY Ltd. v. [read post]
