Search for: "State v. German" Results 2741 - 2760 of 3,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In addition, the EDPB states that informed consent pursuant to Chapter V of the CTR “responds to core ethical requirements of research projects deriving from the Helsinki Declaration and is primarily a measure to ensure the protection of the right to human dignity and the right to integrity of individuals under Article 1 and 3 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU; it is not conceived as an instrument for data protection compliance. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am by Andrew Dickinson
In Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), Mr Justice Owen applied Rome II’s provisions to reach the conclusion that the compensation to be paid by the MIB (acting as the UK’s compensation body under the Fourth Motor Insurance Directive) to the claimant as a result of an accident in a Spanish shopping centre car park in December 2007 in which the other driver was German (and uninsured) should be assessed in accordance with Spanish law, as the law of the… [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am by Schachtman
A German court enjoined Augustine from falsely claiming that the Bair Hugger led to increased bacterial contamination.[7] The United States FDA considered and rejected Augustine’s claims, and recommended the use of FAWDs. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
He is the highest-ranking German government official to visit the country since the start of the Russian invasion. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Ruth Levush
Most people would agree that the Supreme Court is one of the most important government institutions of the United States, due to its power of judicial review rooted in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
However, many legal commentators have stated that Gawker had nowhere to run following a 1985 US Supreme Court decision of Harper & Row Publishers v Nation Enterprises which held that The Nation's unauthorized publication of a 400 word excerpt from an over 600 page autobiography of former President Ford did not qualify as fair use. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm by Michael Grossman
” In 1987, the Texas Supreme Court ruled in El Chico Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
” Similarly, the Heritage Playbook states, without explanation, that all the TPS designations should be ended. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
The term is connected to a number of other similar terms that seek to give meaning to the same set of practices or states of social being: for example, the German-English Weltanschauung) or perhaps “lifeworlds. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:30 pm by Darren O'Donovan
This case would represent a chance for the Irish judiciary to look at again at the Crotty v An Taoiseach, a case recalled with admiration by the barrister Vincent Martin in today’s Irish Times. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am by Florian Mueller
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]