Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
”The Court states (para. 18) that-- “Read in isolation, that sentence could be interpreted as meaning that the licensee cannot, if the licence has not been entered in the Register, rely on the rights conferred by that licence vis-à-vis third parties, including the party infringing the trade mark. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
(Holt v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am
Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnellWe appreciate the lively discussion of Justice Chase’s opinion in Calder v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division stated that it had consistently recognized that "the Board may adopt reasonable rules consistent with and supplemental to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law, and the Chair of the Board may make reasonable regulations consistent with the provisions thereof" (Matter of Randell v Christie's Inc., 183 AD3d 1057, 1059 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].Those regulations require, in relevant part, that… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division stated that it had consistently recognized that "the Board may adopt reasonable rules consistent with and supplemental to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law, and the Chair of the Board may make reasonable regulations consistent with the provisions thereof" (Matter of Randell v Christie's Inc., 183 AD3d 1057, 1059 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].Those regulations require, in relevant part, that… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:15 am
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Mark A. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
Yesterday the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in American Humanist Association v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:16 am
Lord Wilson noted that there is evidence of extensive torture by state forces in Sri Lanka at the relevant time. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
From the order:Because the record in this case contains extensive material marked as confidential, the court has issued its opinion dated August 1, 2017 under seal. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:25 pm
Marvin Ginn v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:05 pm
Christina Waugh won in State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:44 am
”Ricardo Media Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:09 pm
Toyota Motor Sales USA is the exclusive distributor of Lexus vehicles in the United States and guardian of the Lexus mark. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
"(4) A trade mark shall not be registered if, or to the extent that, its use in the United Kingdom is liable to be prevented— (a) by virtue of any rule of law (in particular, the law of passing off) protecting an unregistered trade mark or other sign used in the course of trade, or … A person thus entitled to prevent the use of a trade mark is referred to in this Act as the proprietor of an 'earlier right' in relation to the trade mark.… [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Tata Sons Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:34 am
Classic Liquor Importers, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
In addition, AP writer Mark Sherman reports on the the Court's decision in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:30 pm
Kraft Group LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:50 pm
Greg Reilly IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law Mark A. [read post]
