Search for: "A B C Insurance"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 5,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 12:10 pm
The Act would become a health insurance law without health insurance. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am
International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc, heard 15 and 16 July 2014. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:14 pm
We will see how many states, in the end, actually block the provision of subsidized insurance to their citizens through the exchanges, pulling untold millions of dollars out of their own economies and health care systems, despite the fact that, (a) unlike the Medicaid expansion, the subsidies are free to the states; (b) unlike in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
SeeRestatement (Second) of Torts §134 & comment b (1970).Restatement of TortsThe heeding presumption is derived from language in Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment j (1965) that dealt with the opposite situation − presuming that an adequate warning, when given, will be read and heeded. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
(Majority opinion at p. 37) The majority opinion refuses to question whether under the Affordable Care Act it acts as a substantial burden on an individual’s religious beliefs to require a corporation that you own to provide insurance coverage for contraception, under circumstances where that insurance may or may not actually lead to the use of contraception at the choice of the female employees. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
&C.5th 17 (C.P. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:47 pm
It is difficult to believe that Congress intended for use of such items to require a permit and proof of insurance. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:32 am
[N.J.S.A. 34:13A-16.7(b).] [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 1:22 pm
While performance cost increases will vary from funeral home to funeral home (except for consolidator owned establishments), it is safe to assume most operators are experiencing cost increases in excess of 2%, a rate which trusts and insurance are struggling to provide. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
§ 2254(b)(1)(A)). [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
At the time of the accident both the claimant and the defendants may be habitually resident in country A and by the time of the court’s decision, in country B. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:25 am
Angelika Fuchs: “Direct claim and assignment after cross-border traffic accident” Following the respective judgment of the CJEU (C-347/08), a German court decided that a federal state in Germany, acting as the statutory assignee of the rights of the directly injured party in an international motor accident, may not bring an action directly in the courts of its Member State against the insurer of the person allegedly responsible for the accident, when that… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
b) Limited (e.g., U.S., its possessions and Canada) 4. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
(b) Data Security Requirements Even if a company is not subject to these types of privacy laws, it will want to ensure safeguards for personal information covered by data security and breach notification laws. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm
All current insurance policies of the association and condominiums operated by the association. 9. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
In Aurum Ceramic Dental Laboratories Ltd. v Hwang (“Aurum”), the Court summarized the criteria to be met to find a non-competition clause reasonable: (a) the clause protects a legitimate proprietary interest of the employer; (b) the restraint is reasonable between the parties in terms of: temporal length; spatial area covered; nature of activities prohibited; and overall fairness; (c) the terms of the restraint are clear,… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
On Wednesday 29 October it will hear The Presidential Insurance Company Ltd v Mohammed and Ors regarding the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act, ss 4(7) and 4A. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:20 pm
Index the publications: (a) for contradictory statements for use in impeachment, (b) for general principles supportive of your theory, and (c) for embarrassing quotations about the limits of the expert’s knowledge. [read post]
