Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 3,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
., United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
" Amchem Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
Blake v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 8:32 am
Sureshta Devi v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Bollinger and Gratz v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 11:44 am
As in the United States, successful impeachment globally is quite rare. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
Specifically, he claimed that those counts did not sufficiently allege statutory aggravating factors, as required by Ring v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
These include information on the applicant's race, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy status, marital status, disability, sexual orientation (some state and local jurisdictions), gender expression or identity (some state and local jurisdictions) and genetic information. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:38 am
The Second Circuit stated in Faiveley Transport Malmo AB v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
Specifically, it has used the NDAA process to clarify the U.S. military’s affirmative authority to conduct operations in the cyber domain, to establish that these operations do not constitute “covert action” for purposes of U.S. domestic law even when conducted on a deniable basis, and to subject some such operations to a custom-designed notification-to-Congress rule that is akin to the more familiar one used for covert action. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Judge Posner, who is out promoting his 40th book, reflected in the interview [see around 8:45-10:45] on his opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 10:08 am
Osier v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:09 pm
One of the reasons why it was distinguishable was because this case, Newport v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
They are merely the means by which the state seeks to control – regulate, if you like – the speech of end-users. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
The director will: [S]erve as the principal advisor to the President on cybersecurity policy and strategy relating to the coordination of [cyber defense, cyber-related diplomacy, understanding and deterring malicious cyber actors, and engaging with industry, among others] [§ 1752(A)] [O]ffer advice and consultation to the National Security Council and its staff, the Homeland Security Council and its staff, and relevant Federal departments and agencies, for their consideration relating to the… [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm
” In light of the foregoing facts, the Court found the case more akin to Wollmer v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
This might explain some of what the Supreme Court said and did in the 1993 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
