Search for: "Doe VI " Results 2761 - 2780 of 5,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, the Constitution does not establish the judiciary as an autonomous entity. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This case does not raise any basic question as to the rights of the alleged juvenile delinquent. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
In addition to the oinochoe and the gold objects, which the customs officer initially believed to have been from the first century, authorities seized Iranian artifactsOn April 21, 2011 Officer from CACEF-FedEx/UPS along with Special Agents from SAC/NY, El Dorado Task Force (EDTF) Financial Group VI seized two cultural property shipments. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
Bernardin allegedly thereby obtained access to Sewell's electronic communications and other personal information and sent messages purporting to be from her.On May 15, 2013, Sewell filed a separate suit against Bernardin's wife, Tara Bernardin, and `John Does # 1–5,’ apparently believing that Tara Bernardin and others unknown to her had gained access to her Internet accounts. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
There is no genuine issue of material fact that AU ’168 does notdisclose L-lysine as part of a limited class of compoundsfor ‘A’. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Niamh Quille, Leigh Day
(ii) Does such a person in any event remain subject to the legislation of the UK in the light of Point 19(c) of the United Kingdom’s annex VI to the Regulation? [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 12:58 am
., does the sovereign have unfettered discretion vis-à-vis its citizens or is it constrained by human rights obligations?). [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:29 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
“Everything” is awfully broad and yes, it really does mean everything. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Litigation funders potentially operate as a counterbalance vis-à-vis the D&O insurers and, by creating a level playing field for the parties in a litigation scenario, potentially bring about indemnification. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
.* Draft consultation on online platforms leaked: does the EU really want ISPs to do (much) more? [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 11:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Speculationabout what R+L was attempting to accomplish vis-à-visthe N&M reference does not change our view.Under the statute and our prior case law, it is irrelevantwhy an amended claim is narrowed during reexamination,or even whether the patentee intended to narrowthe claim in a particular way. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 11:05 pm by Marta Requejo
Discussants : Véronique Champeil-Desplat (Paris X), auteure de Méthodologies du droit et des sciences du droit, Dalloz 2014 Jérôme Sgard (Sciences po Paris) VI. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Second, Section 17 is narrower than Rule 10b-5 because it does not allow for private right of action. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
 This qualification does not yet exist - institutions will be able to apply to the Administrative Committee of the UPC for accreditation of appropriate courses. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 1:02 pm
.* Point: The Economist is Infallible - Patents need to be questionedAn Economist article from this recently-passed August kicks off with the fundamental economic question for IP: how does it incentivise innovation? [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:49 am by Karel Frielink
An important requirement for a direct action by the shareholder suffering derivative damage, is that the wrongdoer committed a tort vis-à-vis the shareholder (i.e., violated a specific duty of care towards that shareholder). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Unwed fathers in most states do not have the same rights as unwed mothers vis-à-vis their children. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  While the Neiman Marcus decision may provide some clarity regarding standards of pleading and liability (at least for plaintiffs), for those defendants reliant on network security/privacy liability insurance to protect against data breach claims, the opinion prompts an urgent question: does my policy cover liability for future injuries and preventive measures? [read post]