Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 4,707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2013, 9:14 pm
Typical of our times, the structure of the 41-member conference committee is as much of a mess as Congress itself. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 1:41 pm
But that possibility cannot be entirely excluded from any regime which does not impose rigid rules from which no departure, however minor, is permitted. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 1:41 pm
But that possibility cannot be entirely excluded from any regime which does not impose rigid rules from which no departure, however minor, is permitted. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
” Wirt, supra, 1 Op. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 am
L.R. (5th) 1, 2011 ABCA 94 at paras 23-29; leave to SCC denied, [2011] SCCA No. 260 (QL). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:08 pm
The Board of Education of Roxana Community Unit School District No. 1 v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:21 am
For example, I tried this scenario: Employee with 8-11 years service, between the age of 41-50, working in Sales. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
Amended subparagraph 3-502.12(D)(2)(e)(ii) to allow for cold holding at 41°F for 7 days after cooling to 41°F. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
There must have been an awful lot of evidence to read, because it wasn't until January 2010 that the Opposition Division dismissed the Article 8(1)(b) opposition since there was no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:54 pm
Any law student would recognise some of the famous non-criminal names on the table which led to this mess, obtained by a Conservative MP Philip Davies, whom I debated about this on BBC Radio 5 Live (listen by clicking here, from 1:41:15). [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
That does not mean however, that, if a witness does not itself comply with a request directed to it, the party or representative is indulging in “procedural games”.[36] Therefore, the board decided to refuse the appellant-patentee’s request not to hear the witnesses. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957)). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:51 am
(To be fair, some Senate Democrats do want to change the filibuster, just not enough.)My thought is that we should consider adopting a convention for district court and circuit court judges whereby the party that does not control the Presidency gets 1/3 of the slots. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am
The CJEU argued, however, that there is no equivalent autonomous concept in the Regulation, that art. 5 no. 3 must be interpreted restrictively and that the plaintiff could instead have sued under art. 5 no. 1 or art. 6 no. 1 of the Regulation. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
Here are the long answers: 1. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
Does it create a boulevard for NPEs, then? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Rev. 800 (1983) (READ PARTS II and III) 1. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:15 am
L & Policy 41 (2013). [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
., Oct. 31-Nov. 1, 2013. [read post]
