Search for: "Does 1-30"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 27,604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus, claim 1 of the main request does not define the invention in a complete manner and is inconsistent. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:42 am
Va.) in Doe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:41 pm
“In sum, the [broker’s] report does not provide the requisite basis for appellant’s challenge because (1) its analysis of causation was speculative, and (2) the potential economic consequences it identifies do not “mean that urban decay would result. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:54 pm
How does it work? [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:03 am
Does the brief gloss to July 2010 news amount to putting lipstick on a pig? [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:15 pm
Oct. 30, 2008), cert. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:31 am
What a relief and a blessing it was to have the Texas Supreme Court overturn the trial court judgment against us on August 30. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:49 am
From this angle, the proper ratio is 7:1, 5:1 and 5:1, within due process standards as defined by the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:20 pm
Below is a summary of California’s new law and some takeaways for IoT device manufacturers as they move toward January 1, 2020 compliance. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:07 am
MPEP 804(B)(1). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:43 am
.,[1]which assessed $7.5 million in civil penalties.[2] Some of these administrative actions alleged securities fraud in violations of Section 409.5-501(1), Section 509.5-501(2), and Section 509.501(3). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:19 am
The final rule will be published by August 1, 2015, and generally will apply to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2015. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:41 am
However, it does not change the current compensation system, in force since 1 January 2012. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 2:04 pm
§ 802(e)(1). [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 3:34 am
Precedential No. 1: TTAB Dismisses Opposition to TEQUILA Certification Mark ApplicationDiscovery/Evidence/Procedure: Precedential No. 32: TTAB Defers Decision on Motion to Strike Testimony DeclarationPrecedential No. 31: TTAB Dismisses Section 2(d) Claim Due to Lack of Use of Opposer's Foreign Mark in USAPrecedential No. 30: Party that Cross-Examines Testimony Declarant Bears The ExpensesPrecedential No. 29: TTAB Refuses to Disqualify Itself in TRUMP-Related Cancellation… [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 6:23 pm
(More to this effect from Walter Dellinger here.)1. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm
”[1] The asserted legal authority for these PLI warrants’[2] was SCA § 2703(c)(1)(A). [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm
This transition relief applies for plans under which (1) dependent coverage is not offered, (2) dependent coverage that does not constitute minimum essential coverage is offered, or (3) dependent coverage is offered for some, but not all, dependents. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
No. 1-1 at 48, 81-84.) [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 2:44 pm
Thus, assuming that SVMIC insures the same percentage of defendants actually sued across the state in medical malpractice cases as of June 30, 2012 as it did as of July 1, 2007, the companies defense costs have increased more than fifty percent while the number of claims has decreased thirty percent. [read post]
