Search for: "In Re MILLER "
Results 2761 - 2780
of 3,785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
In re Baxter Travenol Labs, 952 F.2d 388, 390 (Fed. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
State Department, Matthew Miller, said today. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:00 pm
So you’re what, about eight, nine years into your career by now? [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
(While the opinion notes the trial court rejected Respondents’ and Real Parties’ “various procedural defenses” – which were not specified in the opinion, but which in fact included statute of limitations, mootness, and res judicata/collateral estoppel – the Court of Appeal expressly declined to reach these issues, stating in a footnote: “We need not address the Ohlsons’ various procedural defenses because we affirm the trial… [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 11:29 am
The City therefore recirculated a completely re-vamped revised draft EIR (RDEIR) in the form of a “project EIR” which essentially “replaced” the prior program EIR. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
“This is the precise bullet that the trial court correctly dodged in Miller v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 11:13 am
The Court reviewed at length and distinguished In re Marriage of James & Christine C. (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1261, a case heavily relied on by FSFG to support its argument that the trial court lacked discretion to deny its final request for accommodation under rule 1.100. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
With that, we’re ready for the new business. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
CEQA Litigation/Procedural Issues Various of California’s District Courts of Appeal rendered notable decisions on a number of issues relating to the procedures and rules governing the conduct of CEQA litigation, including the following holdings: Res judicata will not apply to bar a subsequent action on the same claim between the same parties unless the first judgment was on the merits. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
In December 2014, it notified LandWatch it had additional documents it would mail upon receiving $34.80 in costs, but LandWatch did not request these documents until March 2015, at which time District had to re-gather them, and they were produced in April 2015. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Another recent appellate decision held CEQA’s statutes of limitations run from the agency’s initial project approval, and the period to bring suit is not re-opened by subsequent approvals that are simply steps to implement the already-approved project. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:04 pm
(CEQA Guidelines, § 15124; In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1175.) [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:40 am
Against the backdrop of another severe drought, water supply and impact issues continue to be points of contention for water agencies, water users, conservation groups, and the state. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
The goal is to “re-envision and revitalize” the neglected Parnassus campus to retain UCSF’s status as a leading and “world-renowned medical complex, research center, and professional school. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:23 am
But Miller was not what he appeared to be. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:54 pm
Following supplemental briefing on these issues, and on whether discharge was precluded because only part of the original project was re-approved, the trial court discharged the writ in December 2023, and STC appealed that discharge order. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm
Circuit emphatically found the Supreme Court’s Nixon and Morrison decisions were binding when Miller challenged Mueller’s appointment in the case in re Grand Jury Investigation. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
., §§ 15161, 15168, 15385, 15152), and relied heavily on what it found to be an analogous Supreme Court decision – In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143 – which held that specific details about a second-tier project (the Environmental Water Account, or EWA) that were released shortly before certification of the first-tier PEIS/R for the CALFED Program need not have been included in the PEIS/R. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
These firms are allegedly complicit in the scheme as they are willing to submit false CEQA reports for improper purposes. (8/7/19 Order re Motion to Dismiss, at 1:20-2:17.) [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm
” (Citing and quoting from In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1163-1166.) [read post]
