Search for: "In re DAVIS"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 4,997
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 10:13 am
Ashley Davis Bush, LCSW, has published a great article on the importance of not badmouthing your ex. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:57 am
We’re often accused of being BigLaw apologists (btw, stop emailing and start commenting if you have something to say!) [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:50 am
While that verdict was overturned on appeal, Microsoft ultimately settled rather than re-try the case. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:34 am
The court uses the primary purpose test, as developed in Davis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:09 am
Most sensitive appears to be discussion of what legal strategy to pursue in the cases of Ryan Cleary and Jake Davis, two British suspects linked to Anonymous. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:40 am
There, the state agriculture agency has told municipalities that their food-related ordinances do not supplant state laws.Shermain Hardesty of the UC Davis Small Farms program thinks some middle ground may be possible. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
Lincoln Davis, pi day resolution. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
Davis made a number of arguments in an attempt to persuade the judge to order a new trial, but we’re only concerned with one of them. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:16 am
At that point, the participants began talking about Ryan Cleary and Jake Davis, two U.K. suspects linked to Anonymous. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:01 am
., you just show up, pay your $75 or whatever it is, sign your form, and you’re ready to go. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:51 pm
Davis was killed: his death has undoubtedly affected his loved ones, who have to cope with such a sudden, senseless loss. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:11 am
"I'm glad they're looking into it," he said. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:45 pm
So now we’re caught up, and Ryan this is for you. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:39 am
An $11 increase would violate the Davis-Stirling Act. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
App. 2010), quoting Davis v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:30 pm
Eugene Davis, in which all three judges on the panel joined, that began, "I write separately to express my disagreement with the recent holding by the In re Amy panel that section 2259 does not limit the victim's recoverable losses to those proximately caused by the defendant's offense and to urge the court to grant en banc review of that decision. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:33 pm
Daniel Davis (R). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
(Davis Wright Tremaine)Restoration of Copyright in Foreign Works Passes Constitutional Muster (McDermott)Defense Attorneys' Fee Standards Set in Pennsylvania Trade Secret Suits (Littler)A Comparison of US and EU Biosimilars Regimes (Fenwick & West)America Invents Act - Already Making its Mark (Venable)How to Protect Your Brand Without Being a Trademark Bully: Lessons from The North Face and Coke (Foley Hoag)A Major Brew-haha on Tap (Greenberg Glusker)Curtain Call: Supremes Bow to… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:20 am
’ It’s another thing to say, ‘We’re taking steps to make sure that this doesn’t happen again; we’re taking steps to make sure that we’re addressing attitudes that allowed this to happen in the first place,’” she tells Legal Feeds. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:40 am
You’re going to work your fingers to the bone. [read post]
