Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 7,890
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
National/Federal 2-Year Sentence for Hawaii Woman’s Trump Lobbying Scheme MSN – Associated Press | Published: 1/18/2023 An American consultant was sentenced to two years in prison for an illicit lobbying effort to get the Trump administration to drop an investigation into the multibillion-dollar looting of a Malaysian state investment fund, and to arrange for the return of a Chinese dissident living in the U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:20 am
Defendants' two-pronged argument was that: (1) plaintiffs failed to adequately allege that the Board majority was independent and disinterested; and (2) the Board's decision was the product of a valid business judgment. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:02 am
John Pratt because 1) his opinions do not fit the facts of the case, 2) his opinions are not the result of scientific methodology and would therefore not assist the trier of fact, and 3) he is not a warnings or human factors expert and is thus not cannot offer these opinions in this case. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 10:05 pm
(My reviews: 1, 2.) [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
The defendants countered this claim by arguing that: 1) Oregon securities law does not apply because the notes were not bought or sold in Oregon, 2) the notes are not securities as a matter of law, and 3) Wilkins made no material misstatements or omissions of fact as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm
The deferred action initiative is temporary (two-years), and may be cancelled at any time for any reason, or for no reason. 3. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
” What does this word mean? [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:51 am
For example, don’t write, “I’m leaving property to my hunting buddy John”; instead state John’s first and last name, and precisely tell who John is. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 11:05 am
For example, don’t write, “I’m leaving property to my hunting buddy John”; instead state John’s first and last name, and precisely tell who John is. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 8:37 pm
But Item 2 is the most important. 1. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 11:43 am
II, § 2, cl. 3. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:59 am
In this post, John S. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:04 pm
2. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
It has been held that taking discovery does not trigger a waiver, nor does proceeding to trial. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am
The first four parts cover 1) copyright and related rights, 2) patent and trade secret, 3) trade mark and design, which are then subdivided according to different types of digital technology. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
[RPEA] v Cuomo decisionThe Retired Public Employees Association [RPEA] challenged the State's reduction of the percentage of its employer contribution towards health insurance premiums with respect to “pre-contract” State retirees, contending that: [1] Civil Service Law §167.1 sets out the ratio of employer contributions the State was required to make on behalf on these pre-contract State retirees and that provision was not amended to provide for a different… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
" Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Act § 2(3) (1999). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relists Not much is happening in D.C. right now, so what can the Supreme Court do to give us a break from the tedium of endless Zoom meetings? [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:15 am
Because she stays in the quorum until 2011, John Roberts does not become Chief Justice.* In December 2000, the Court consists of Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan's fourth appointment, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton's third appointment, and Clinton's fourth appointment. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors heard 3 December 2010 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
