Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 5,778
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
As we see #s go up, need to build internal tools. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:03 am
[Trial judge]: I’m done, D-O-N-E, done. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:54 am
It’s not the writtenness, but the fact of ratification, that matters. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:07 am
Land: if we just went w/users, it’d be all porn, so it makes sense for companies to have freedom to shape their own communities. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
The Torstar case was abundantly clear that writing on matters of public interest is not reserved to the mass media. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Def.'s Mot. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:43 am
I’d like to do that,” after being told of the right to counsel, that statement was a clear request for counsel—particularly because the defendant had mentioned earlier to the officers that a woman had told him to get a lawyer because they would railroad him. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:43 am
I’d like to do that,” after being told of the right to counsel, that statement was a clear request for counsel—particularly because the defendant had mentioned earlier to the officers that a woman had told him to get a lawyer because they would railroad him. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
Photo credit Christopher Lenney Does it really matter? [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Indeed, this government-friendly approach to the “ample alternative channels” inquiry is sharply inconsistent with this Court’s most recent precedent on the matter, City of Ladue v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 12:33 am
That's up to us, right? [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
Nevertheless, it is clear that even where a purely private matter between private parties is at issue, the defendant's freedom of expression is still implicated and the First Amendment still affords some, though less substantial, protections. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
& n. 15. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:02 am
That includes the power to criminalize an individual’s expression of sexual fantasies, no matter how perverse or disturbing. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:20 am
For starters, in 1990 there was not a specific “statute on the books” that permitted the Secretary to grant “extended voluntary departure” (EVD)—a form of removal forbearance, like deferred action—to the Family Fairness aliens . . . or to any other aliens, for that matter. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:05 am
According to Article 52(2)(d) European Patent Convention, „presentations of information“ as such (Article 52(3)) shall not be regarded as inventions. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
(See Exhibits C and D attached to defendant's motion.) [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:56 am
The court went on to explain that [i]n conducting a review under Article 62(b), UCMJ, of a military judge's decision to exclude matters, this court may act only with respect to matters of law. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
As a practical matter, the impact of Halliburton II will depend upon what lower courts require to disprove price impact. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:02 am
But the subject matter of this litigation brought a fair amount of attention, so let’s take a quick look at last September’s Ninth Circuit decision, which now stands. [read post]
