Search for: "MATTER OF J M J" Results 2761 - 2780 of 5,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2014, 9:57 pm
Why does this matter for the constitutionality of the death penalty? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:57 am by Eric Turkewitz
I’ve said this before my friends, and I’ll say it again: I have a thesaurus and I’m not afraid to use it. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:44 pm by Nietzer
These enhanced obligations agreed to by J&J in the M&A context were less time sensitive than those agreed to by Halliburton in 08-02. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:51 am by Terry Hart
Today, the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet is continuing its comprehensive review of US copyright law with a hearing on moral rights, termination rights, resale royalty, and copyright term. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 12:42 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question ” I’m considering separating from my spouse; what actions should I refrain from doing? [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
Warshak, 532 F.3d 521 (6th Cir. 2008) (en banc) (Sutton, J.). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
Zupančič,Elisabeth Steiner,Khanlar Hajiyev,Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,Ledi Bianku,Ganna Yudkivska,Angelika Nußberger,Erik Møse,André Potocki,Paul Lemmens,Helena Jäderblom,Aleš Pejchal, judges,and Erik Fribergh, Registrar,Having deliberated in private on 27 November 2013 and on 5 June 2014,Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last‑mentioned date:PROCEDURE1. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KZ3410 .A44 2014Karen J. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm by Lucy Reed
Also referred to are the obiter remarks of Coulson J in M v Director of Legal Aid and Casework [2014] EWHC 1354 (Admin). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]