Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 2761 - 2780 of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
 On the very same date, but at 17:45 hours, Pool Angel Tomás SL applied to the Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas (the Spanish Patent and Trade Mark Office, OEPM) for registration of the word mark RIZO’S for goods in Class 28 [Merpel says, I think I know what's coming ...]. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:49 am
Tractor trailer was lawfully stopped for traffic offense and then officer noticed that it had insufficient markings for interstate use. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Traditional hemp goods are in the manual, but not cannabis. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am by The Legal Blog
The said decision cannot be held to be good law and to that extent is overruled.39. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 11:43 am
Consequently, physical limitations that still exist beyond the one-year mark are more probably than not permanent. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 2:33 pm by Tonya Gisselberg
§1117(c)(2) sets out the statutory maximum for willful trademark infringement involving counterfeit marks. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:06 am by SHG
As justices sit with life tenure upon good behavior, it’s entirely up to them and the grim reaper when they decide to vacate their seat. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Gmlevine
Respondent purchased for a prospective Internet clothing business and offered sufficient evidence of demonstrable preparations to succeed in its 4(c)(i) defense. [read post]
15 May 2010, 5:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ebert,The Interrelationship of C(60), Soot and Combustion, 31 Carbon 999 (1993). [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Most people fixate on the first element of legal malpractice – departure from good practice. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
It will thus retrace the different political, legislative, and judicial developments occurred, which have been marked as relevant for, or targeted to, LGBTIQA+ persons. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:09 pm
Provisionally the Kat thinks that there is no challenge per se under (i), since prior use is not a ground on which a CTM can be nullified unless it establishes that the mark is non-distinctive, descriptive or suffers from some other defect which would prevent the relevant consumer from associating it with the owner's goods or services. [read post]