Search for: "Mines v. State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 3,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Kansas is a huge state, and most of those watching probably couldn’t have made it to Topeka even under normal circumstances. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:13 am
” (Bixby v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:03 pm
Professor Lawless had a similar reaction to mine--that by preempting state subpoenas but not lawsuits, the decision creates a strange incentive for states to sue first and ask questions later. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 8:22 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Sorrell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 3:54 am
They hope to take advantage of a never-used aspect of Article V, which says in part that Congress, “on the application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:23 pm
Wood storks v. developers. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 8:22 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Sorrell v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:06 am
Climate Change and the Courts Greenhouse Gaslighting: Deceptive Moderation and West Virginia v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:27 pm
In his view, this is best achieved through the established test in R v Collins, [1987] 1 SCR 265, 308. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:21 pm
The missing reference is John Vallamattom v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
That trend was reversed following the Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
All are in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:28 am
IAE, INC. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
In American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Its line was that: The applicant had provided no proof that it would be able to enforce rights (if any) on behalf of the artist.No copyright infringement could have occurred because [the translation from Italian is mine] "the activity of artist BANKSY would stand as a demonstration of the intention to renounce any copyrights on his/her works, in that such works are permanently located on display in public places". [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Professor George, however, exceeds all reasonable boundaries even for me (someone who is pro-choice but thinks the issue should be returned to the states). [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
