Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 2761 - 2780 of 7,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 6:55 am by Marissa Miller
United States, in which the Court will consider whether its ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday, the parties jointly asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for 60 additional days to file their initial pleadings. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday, the parties jointly asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for 60 additional days to file their initial pleadings. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Steven Boutwell
Because the accident occurred upon the navigable waterways of the United States, admiralty jurisdiction and general maritime law applied to this case. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:04 am by Ben Jumonville and Mikha Romero
[1] National Small Business United, d/b/a the National Small Business Association v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome:West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Ltd (“WestWard”)1 appeals the decision of the United States DistrictCourt for the District of Delaware holding that claims 1–3of U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:58 pm by Rich Cassidy
A new case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit,  US Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:07 pm by Jon Sands
  The government will have another opportunity to prove the amount of loss.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/08/07/14-30034.pdf United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticePolice Authorized to Search Apartment, Met 'Miranda' Public Safety Exception; Gun's Suppresion Denied United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am by Ashwin Sharma
The primary objective of the adjustments to the Schedule of Fees is to ensure that fees for consular services reflect costs to the United States of providing the services. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:59 pm by Gene Quinn
  The reason even this thought experiment is not particularly useful is because all of those States, and in fact all of the States in the United States, speak the same language. [read post]