Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 13,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:39 pm
Rosenthal of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
California (1931), Nebbia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Heasley).Non-ownership: Opposer claimed that the mark was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, a California corporation, and therefore that JY Insyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 2:44 pm
Robert Romero v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No: 20-cv-4419 Filed: May 15, 2020 […] [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:25 am
South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
First, on May 26, the South Bay United Pentecostal Church in California filed an application for injunctive relief with Circuit Justice Kagan. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf wonders why the dissenters to the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In two companion cases, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided whether a federal district court could properly exercise jurisdiction over climate change suits brought against energy companies by cities and counties in California. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In two companion cases, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided whether a federal district court could properly exercise jurisdiction over climate change suits brought against energy companies by cities and counties in California. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:51 am
Sell v United States, a Supreme Court case, allowed states to medicate individuals too incompetent to stand trial. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:03 am
] Last weekend, the Supreme Court rejected a California church's application for a temporary injunction against enforcement of a state public-health order limiting attendance at houses of worship (South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
“Do you think the United States would allow Hawaii and California to declare independence? [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
At The National Law Review, Evan Seeman looks at the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
The certification also stated plaintiff “[understood] that [defendant] reserve[d] the right to null and void the auction and sale of the unit for any reason. [read post]
