Search for: "State v. David." Results 2761 - 2780 of 14,227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Illusion of More, David Newhoff asks whether Google v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 6:11 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  One way of doing this is talked about in this Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, opinion styled, Jeanette Kotzur, David Kotzur v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
David W Stratas’s contribution to a group of essays Paul Daly organized in May 2018 about the case here.) [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
The RSVP deadline is Jan. 16, not Jan.14 as stated in the flier. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from David Porter at AP and Ephrat Livni at Quartz. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
As noted by translator David McDuff: Few works of fiction have attracted so many widely divergent interpretations as Crime and Punishment. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:20 am by Hannah Kris
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
United States, as well as at Howe on the Court, where it was originally published. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The IJ people gave an answer there, and IJ's David Hodges has kindly written it up for me to post: In September, Linda Greenhouse of the New York Timesnoted something "odd" about Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:21 pm by David Mangan
David ManganCan an employee be an expert in her work, beyond her employment? [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:35 pm
In Beats v LG [2016] SGIPOS 8, IP Adjudicator David Llewelyn applied Staywell, but suggested considering the nature of the relevant goods vis-a-vis the earlier mark's distinctiveness at the mark-similarity stage rather than only at the likelihood of confusion stage. 2. [read post]