Search for: "State v. Liberator" Results 2761 - 2780 of 7,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2021, 5:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Group, Inc., 30 NY3d 288, 298 [2017]; AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:28 pm by Ilya Somin
So it’s understandable that liberals would do the same thing. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Is it liberal, or socialist, or neoliberal, or conservative, or something else? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:18 pm by Ken
As Patrick referenced, the Supreme Court recently struck down another censorious law in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Nate Russell
The correct test for demonstrating prima facie discrimination per Moore v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:33 am by Ilya Somin
That is particularly likely in the case of the state government plaintiffs, since the Court recently adopted extremely permissive standing requirements for state plaintiffs in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
The three liberals dissented in all three cases. [read post]
Moreover, the court has liberally applied its racial-vote-dilution jurisprudence in the context of political gerrymandering. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:00 pm
In its opinion in Kentucky Retirement Systems v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]