Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 2761 - 2780 of 11,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2019, 10:24 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, famous for (among other high-profile cases) FTC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:21 pm by Dan Bressler
Prosecutors said the court could have “no confidence that Cole will not use, whether intentionally or not, information” from that investigation. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:17 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Cucchi is admitted to practice law before the state courts of California and is a member of the State Bar of California. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:17 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Cucchi is admitted to practice law before the state courts of California and is a member of the State Bar of California. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 11:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Rosette (Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMatter of Delaney (Attorney Discipline)  U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:11 am by Unknown
Rosette (Sovereign Immunity)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMatter of Delaney (Attorney Discipline) U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
"On the state side, check out Judge Need Not Inquire if the Parties Want a Court Reporter—C.A. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
Finally, courts have stated that Section 230 also bars breach of contract actions for a website’s content-removal decisions, meaning that Section 230 might even immunize a website that took down content in violation of its own terms of service. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Every restaurant and bar in the state must adopt a written sexual harassment policy and provide it to all employees within the first calendar week of employment. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by SHG
But they have an ally in “Fix The Courts. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which permits the president to bar entry of foreign nationals that would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:08 am by Jesse M. Coleman and John Phillips
The Ninth Circuit held that the because the counterclaims were permissive (not compulsory), they should have been brought in a separate lawsuit in California state court. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance Georgia: “Abrams Campaign Seeks Dismissal of Request for Additional Documents in Ethics Probe” by Stephen Fowler for Georgia Public Broadcasting New Mexico: “Regulators Late on Campaign Finance Checks” by Morgan Lee (Associated Press) for Albuquerque Journal Elections Pennsylvania: “A Pennsylvania County’s Election Day Nightmare Underscores Voting Machine Concerns” by Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) for MSN Ethics National: “Ilhan… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:15 am by SHG
Is it just one person, one monumentally stupid person, or is this the view of the California Bar Association? [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While none of those cases deal with an Indian nation, Defendants would have this Court apply them by way of analogy: namely, an Indian nation is like the State of Louisiana, the Southampton Fire District, or a Zimbabwe-owned airline and, so, it too should be barred. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:57 am by Ben
This case has been lodged in the US District Court for the Central District of California, as reported by the World IP review. [read post]