Search for: "*u. S. v. Haves"
Results 261 - 280
of 9,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm
See Shager v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
”The Appellate Division annulled Teacher's termination and the summer 2011 U-rating and then remanded the matter to DOE for completion of its final review of the second U-rating for the 2011-2012 school year [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:33 am
Ceballos, 547 U. [read post]
28 May 2018, 2:17 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 2, 2018, Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:22 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
S., at ___ (slip op., at 8); Liparota, 471 U. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:14 am
The U visa's basic purpose is to make it easier for police to prosecute those who commit violence. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:00 am
S. ex rel Acoustical Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
Paul, 505 U. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:10 pm
As Bob McCarty reports here, ACCA today rejected the appeal and petition for new trial in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:01 am
This was certainly the case for u/redpanda891, who took to Reddit to after a disconcerting family dinner: “[Am I the A**hole] for calling my sister’s husband a piece of s**t because he’s representing my ex in our divorce? [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:39 am
New York, 589 U. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:16 pm
Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51455(U)(App.Term 2d Dept. 2010) You have seem this before. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:13 am
S. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:43 pm
Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51300(U)(App. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:26 pm
Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 52023(U)(App. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:02 pm
” “Plaintiff’s remaining argument on appeal is that defendant’s cross motion should have been denied because defendant, without explanation, paid some of the claims at issue at the rate [...] [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:30 pm
., P.C. v Clarendon Natl. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:09 pm
In its order, the court held that “[u]pon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and amici, and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised” the ICA’s judgment is affirmed. [read post]
