Search for: "ACE LTD" Results 261 - 280 of 768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2017, 7:17 am by Lorelie S. Masters
*                      *                      * History of the Bermuda Form Insurance broker Marsh & McLennan, with a consortium of US policyholder companies from across the Fortune 500, created the first Bermuda Form insurance companies, ACE Insurance Company, Ltd., and… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
In determining meaning, Jeynes v News Magazines Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 130 [14] articulates several well-settled principles to be applied. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am by Ben
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 1:34 am by INFORRM
Matthew Nicklin has appeared for both claimants and defendants in a many notable media law cases including, most recently, Shakil-Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd  [2017] 4 WLR 22 Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing SA [2016] EWHC 66 (QB) Gulati v MGN Ltd and other cases – [2016] 3 All ER 799 Rhodes v OPO and another [2015] AC 219 Cruddas v Calvert and others [2015] EWCA Civ 171 It seems likely that Mr Justice Nicklin will join his former Chambers colleague Mr… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 1:34 am by INFORRM
Matthew Nicklin has appeared for both claimants and defendants in a many notable media law cases including, most recently, Shakil-Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd  [2017] 4 WLR 22 Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing SA [2016] EWHC 66 (QB) Gulati v MGN Ltd and other cases – [2016] 3 All ER 799 Rhodes v OPO and another [2015] AC 219 Cruddas v Calvert and others [2015] EWCA Civ 171 It seems likely that Mr Justice Nicklin will join his former Chambers colleague Mr… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 1:34 am by INFORRM
Matthew Nicklin has appeared for both claimants and defendants in a many notable media law cases including, most recently, Shakil-Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd  [2017] 4 WLR 22 Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing SA [2016] EWHC 66 (QB) Gulati v MGN Ltd and other cases – [2016] 3 All ER 799 Rhodes v OPO and another [2015] AC 219 Cruddas v Calvert and others [2015] EWCA Civ 171 It seems likely that Mr Justice Nicklin will join his former Chambers colleague Mr… [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
  Further, four members of the House of Lords in OBG Ltd v Allen had emphasized the need to confine the tort within careful limits. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) Several months ago I posted a draft syllabus for a new course on Corporate Social Responsibility (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
Arguably, the effect on claimants of the band of reasonable responses test has been ameliorated by decisions such as Newbound v Thames Water Utilities Ltd relying on s 98(4)(b) to emphasis the test’s practical limits:  The “band of reasonable responses” has been a stock phrase in employment law for over thirty years, but the band is not infinitely wide. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:36 am by David Hart QC
Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd and Jacqueline Lewis) v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:38 am by INFORRM
In Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Ors ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)) Warby J applied (and endorsed) the principle, established in Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371, that every republication of a defamatory statement is a new publication and creates a fresh cause of action for the person defamed (see [74]-[86]) (whilst we await the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Lachaux, there is currently no information available on when this will be handed down). [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:41 am by Ron Coleman
This undoubtedly seemed like a good way to avoid a lot of “business,” because the premise of this classic conundrum is that the exclusive distributor has apparently aced the manufacturer out of goodwill by using the manufacturer’s own mark in commerce before (usually way before) the manufacturer has (if it indeed ever has at all). [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Popplewell J, referring to Lord Keith’s dictum in Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 (the “Spycatcher” case), decided it was not necessary for the disclosure to cause detriment to BHAM. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
Ltd [2006] QB 125 and OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1) that each publication of photographs or videos is a fresh intrusion of privacy. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
The House of Lords case Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457– where Naomi Campbell claimed the publication of her treatment at Narcotics Anonymous (“NA”) infringed her right to be respected for her private life under Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:07 pm by Giles Peaker
(1) Camelot Property Management Ltd, (2) Camelot Guardian Management Ltd v Greg Roynon. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 15 February 2017 Warby J heard an application in the case of Flymenow Ltd v Quick Air Jet Charter GmbH. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
She also noted [at 50] that in Comic Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]