Search for: "Alabama v. Arizona"
Results 261 - 280
of 569
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
Complaining that the convictions are still valid even if the sentence is not, see Alabama v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm
The story of Glossip v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:08 am
The Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Lopez-Valenzuela, 14-825, which sought review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision striking down Arizona’s Proposition 100 and holding that a denial of bail is permissible only after individualized assessment of flight risk or future dangerousness. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
First up, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Virginia instructs and as multiple state and federal courts have held, or at some indeterminate later time, as Texas, Alabama, Florida, and Oklahoma have held; and (2) whether a state court’s reliance on nondiagnostic criteria and lay observation violates this Court’s pronouncements in Atkins and Hall v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:00 am
Kermit V. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Then there’s three-time relist County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Meanwhile, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
Alabama, 14-8189, and Lockhart v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Here are some recent developments on the sexual orientation front: In June 2013, in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:08 pm
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 609 (2002). [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:39 am
In other news: Miller v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
I suspect that the hold out juror in the Jodi Arias case in Arizona fell into that category. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:08 pm
Arizona. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Arizona applies to Florida’s capital sentencing scheme, which requires a judge to impose a sentence after considering the jury’s (potentially non-unanimous) recommendation. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
