Search for: "Alexander v. Brown" Results 261 - 280 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
Todd Brown, "Non-Pecuniary Interests and the Injudicious Limits of Appellate Standing in Bankruptcy" (Abstract ID: 1114917) *** Santa Clara University's Alexander J. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
It was therefore a "liberal" approach to constitutional interpretation that produced such decisions as Brown v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  The three most recent full trials are Hughes v Risbridger (2010 EWHC 491 (QB)) Berezovsky v Russian Television (10 March 2010 EWHC 476 (QB)) and Gary Flood v Times Newspapers (16 October 2009 EWHC 2375 (QB)). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019). [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]