Search for: "Am. Federation of State, Etc. v. State, Etc."
Results 261 - 280
of 588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
Do We Finally Have a Canadian Re:Sound Copyright “Fitness Tariff” After 8 Years? “Are We There Yet”?
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm
Re:Sound was seeking “roughly $86 million per year” from fitness facility operators, etc. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:37 am
(See Virginia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm
In a published speech from 2006, now the retired Chairman of the Copyright Board (William Vancise) stated shortly after his appointment:I am not at all happy with the time it takes to render a final decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
Am. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:28 pm
The case of John v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
I am inclined to think that he federal government has too much leverage over the states as a general matter, and would welcome greater judicial scrutiny of such inducements. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm
ACA litigation, including King v Burwell Self-reporting ACA violations Other topics, including cafeteria plan elections, etc. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
Pretending to practice witchcraft, etc. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
And so, there should be a resounding affirmation from federal and state courts to the proclaimed “need for critical appraisal of expert witnesses in epidemiology and statistics,” as well as in many other disciplines. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
And so, there should be a resounding affirmation from federal and state courts to the proclaimed “need for critical appraisal of expert witnesses in epidemiology and statistics,” as well as in many other disciplines. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm
So I am curious how Choi is planning to distinguish §101. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
The U.S. case is Feist Publications v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
An interesting wrinkle in the preemption argument, as put forward by the complaining states, is that it expressly relies upon the rationale of Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:06 am
Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
I am betting it goes longer. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 5:46 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
