Search for: "Andrew v. Kennedy"
Results 261 - 280
of 367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:27 pm
The New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG) represents the plaintiffs in the suit, Belovic v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:57 am
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:53 am
First, it is not at all a stretch to think that Justice Kennedy — who will likely write the 5 person majority opinion — will vote as such. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:00 pm
Richard Kluger, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:55 am
It is no answer to point to cases like Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
” Reports for this blog on the reactions of Republican and Democratic senators to the Kavanaugh nomination come from Andrew Hamm and Jon Levitan, respectively. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm
Lee v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Tax systems treat taxpayers differently all the time, and the central question before the Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:17 pm
In April, against all odds, Barlow & Bear took home the trophy over such Broadway luminaries as Andrew Lloyd Webber and Stephen Schwartz. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
Andrew Erickson and Connor Kennedy provide additional details about China’s “Little Blue Men” in the second installment of their series on this important subject. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:03 pm
Kennedy left satire out of his analysis altogether; parody must target original, not just genre to which it belongs or society as a whole. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
Andrew Sullivan notes that I myself said the federal government was more likely to prevail than the plaintiffs, in a Reason TV video a few weeks before the oral argument. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
Romer v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
Kennedy School of Government. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
Kennedy School of Government. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
See Tandon v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:46 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy seized on that distinction early, asking Andrew Pincus, counsel for the defendant Impression Products, “[w]hy hasn’t this been codified? [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm
Andrew A. [read post]
