Search for: "Apotex"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 2:36 am
Sanofi, in turn, accused Apotex of threatening infringement.For the duration of the resulting proceedings, injunctions imposed by the court, along with undertakings that Apotex provided, prevented it from introducing a generic product, leaving patients, and the Australian Government, with no alternative to the premium-priced brand-name product PLAVIX. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 11:39 pm
The judge at first instance (in Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 4) [2013] FCA 162) had found that the AstraZeneca inventions claimed in the patents at issue lacked an inventive step based, in part, on the reasoning of an earlier Full Court panel in Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis [2009] FCAFC 134. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:15 am
Last week on November 6, 2008, the Supreme Court of Canada delivered it judgment in an important patent case concerning "selection patents. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:14 am
In the Otsuka Pharmaceutical case at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Judge Lourie concluded For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court. [read post]
6 May 2012, 8:43 pm
Apotex, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 10:24 am
Apotex (Fed. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 8:31 pm
Patents In the United States, PatentlyO reported that Apotex Inc. recently issued a petition for writ of certiorari in the case of Apotex Inc. v Cephalon, Inc., asking the Supreme Court to revisit motivation to combine, obvious to try and whether the non-obvious contribution needs to be an improvement over the prior art. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:51 am
Defendants are Apotex Corp. of Weston, Florida and Apotex Inc. of Ontario, Canada. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
Apotex, No. 2006-1261 (Fed. [read post]
18 May 2007, 11:43 am
Apotex and Mylan have now appealed to the D.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
How far such edits must go is put in doubt by the Federal Court of Appeal decision in Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:41 am
Based on the above description of the present circumstances, you might think that a generic manufacturer, such as Apotex, would now have the right to market a competing leflunomide product for the purposes covered by the existing approvals, i.e. treatment of rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-08-03: Commissioning party owns copyright in logo Atelier Eighty Two Lt… http://t.co/IPWmsVQC3A -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-08-03 http://t.co/eVxOrd9oGJ -> Canada's FCA Upholds C$180 Million Judgment in Favour of Merck Against Apotex in a Landmark Patent Damages Ruling http://t.co/WHbfEOd5GV -> [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
.), the Federal Circuit upheld the validity of the Orange Book-listed patents for Lysteda®, but found that they were not infringed by either Apotex’s or Watson’s Abbreviated New Drug Applications... [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 1:04 pm
Apotex, Inc., 2008 U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 4:43 am
Patents: Les Laboratoires Servier and another v Apotex Inc and others [2014] UKSC 55, [2014] 3 WLR 1257, [2014] WLR(D) 452, [2014] BUS LR 1217, UK Supreme Court In Everet v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
Apotex, Inc., decided last week, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court finding of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:19 pm
Apotex, Inc., No. 08-437, an implied preemption decision out of the Third Circuit involving an anti-depressant, pending the outcome of Wyeth. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:55 am
Apotex, Inc. at this link. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 7:01 am
Apotex from August 3, 2008, to October 2, 2008.On Thursday, July 24, Justice Souter granted that motion.For those who must see proof with their own eyes, here's a link to the Colacicco docket on the U.S. [read post]
