Search for: "Arnold v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 595
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 9:21 am
On consideration of the certified issue, __ M.J. __, (Daily Journal Apr. 3, 2015), the briefs of the parties, and in view of United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
ARNOLD and TINA ARNOLD, Appellants, v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies… [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm
” “In the United States there was not, after the beginning of the last quarter of the century, any opportunity whatever for individual enterprise in any important field of industry, unless backed by great capital. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 3:09 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 12:52 pm
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state and administrative courts in North Carolina, before the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
Arnold v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
Wainwright (and featuring Judge Morris Arnold). [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
That was until 1977, when the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bates v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Even knowing falsehoods about large groups likely protected, too: Given United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
” Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
Arnold of Garvey, Schubert & Barer. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
The Innovation Protection Act - which concerns funding of the United Stated Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).The pace of reform happening in the US is quite astounding and impressive. [read post]
