Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 261 - 280
of 551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
Pension Fund v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
If an MDL decision was favorable to the defendant only on, say, asbestos exposure product identification (the most common example by far), we have not included it.Caveat #4. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 1:35 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:58 am
It is undisputed that the manufacturers knew (and intended) that their products would be used with asbestos; they could not practicably function without asbestos insulation. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:21 pm
Due to the mass production of asbestos containing products and long latency periods for asbestos-related injuries (think decades), asbestos manufacturers injured a large number of individuals whose injuries were temporally dispersed. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:22 am
Additional Resources: Asbestos-sickened shipyard worker loses fight against Navy supplier, November 23, 2016, By Bob Egelko, SF Gate More Blog Entries: Rondon v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Selikoff, back in 1954, as an expert witness in the “original 17” UNARCO (Union Asbestos and Rubber Co.) asbestos worker claims. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:44 am
McDonald v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 2:00 pm
Georgia-Pacific presented OneBeacon Insurance Company, the successor to Employers, with $10 million of asbestos product-liability losses allegedly covered by the Employers policy. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:30 pm
The landmark case of Borel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:40 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm
Kurns holds that the Locomotive Inspection Act ("LIA") preempts a railroad engine repair worker's state-law products liability claim to recover for mesothelioma caused by asbestos in the brake lining of railroad cars. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[t]he reasoning in both the George and White cases is applicable”), aff’d, 44 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 1995); In re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 872 F. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:52 am
The government contractor defense shields companies from liability if they rely on government specifications, accurately follow those specifications, and inform the government about any problems with the product the government doesn’t know about. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Fraud GAF’s claims of frauds discussed[15] earlier focused on the claim that asbestos plaintiffs’ lawyers focused had committed [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:47 am
Shamir v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
In North v. [read post]
