Search for: "BUIS v. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 9,787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:47 am
Turning to recent actions, the July decision in SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:31 am
Buying a used car can be an exciting experience, but it comes with risks, particularly when it involves fraud. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:42 am
I don’t buy it. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The complaints against the digital leaders include allegations of (1) undermining traditional media; (2) violating user privacy and data security; (3) pirating third-party data from e-commerce suppliers to imitate, front-run, or otherwise undermine and displace such suppliers from their own product markets; (4) manipulating their platforms to favor their own products and services (“self-preferencing”); (5) expanding monopoly power by buying up “nascent competitors”… [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:59 pm
We think so, and in an amicus brief filed last Friday in Long Lake Township v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am
From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 7:49 am
Texas v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 3:09 am
Unit Petroleum Company v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:16 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in D.C. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Below, I elaborate first on how transaction costs doom the aims of age-verification and verifiable parental-consent laws, and then consider the state of First Amendment precedent for anonymous speech as it relates to age-verification laws. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
When it approved the CAT, the Commission stated that plan participants could “recoup their regulatory costs . . . through the collection of fees from their members, as long as such fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 12:28 pm
But the supplement is absolutely free, even if you didn't buy the main textbook. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:49 am
REX – Real Estate Exchange, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In other situations, the purchaser may only be looking to buy the assets of the business. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In other situations, the purchaser may only be looking to buy the assets of the business. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
For example, in DeHoog v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:50 am
Gunaratna v. [read post]
