Search for: "Battle v. Maryland" Results 261 - 280 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Change is coming, the question is just when and where, with Match Group's Dutch case so far having the greatest potential of all enforcement actions under existing law (as it could have EU-wide ripple effects and easily apply to all--not just dating--apps).Epic Games faces an uphill battle (here's my take on its opening brief), but it's getting some amazing support:35 U.S. states led by Utah and Microsoft have officially thrown their weight behind Epic's appeal through… [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
” In a post at Harmless Error, Luke Rioux compares the Court’s recent decision in Riley v California, holding that police must generally obtain a warrant to search an arrestee’s cellphone, with last year’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
No. 337-TA-755) (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright US provides misleading answer to WIPO questionnaire on export of accessible works under US law (Knowledge Ecology International) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeals 11th Circuit: Saregama’s lack of standing to sue: Saregama India Ltd v Timothy Mosley (Spicy IP) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Kanye West wins copyright battle – N D Illinois grants motion to dismiss infringement complaint in Vincent… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:33 am by Clara Spera
Paul also highlighted the Supreme Court’s oral argument in Patel v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:14 am by Michael Lowe
Defense lawyers must face these two-tier defense battles all too often here in Dallas and North Texas. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Engrasp, Inc. et al (Docket Report)   US Copyright S 978 Bill would strengthen criminal copyright infringement law (Maryland IP Law)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court E D Missouri: Copyright and tattoos: Hangover II preliminary injunction denied, but copyright owner got some good news too: Whitmill v. [read post]