Search for: "Best v. State Bar"
Results 261 - 280
of 4,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 12:04 pm
"The requirement that every employee have a net 10-minute rest period every four hours or major fraction thereof is a state-mandated minimum labor standard.' " Cicairos v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am
For example, in Chester, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWHC 2923, a prisoner claimed that his rights had been breached as prisoners in the UK are barred from voting in elections. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
State, 714 P.2d 1176, 1180 (Wash. 1986) (en banc); Univ. of Minn. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:41 am
Real Estate Comm'n, 281 So.2d 487, 491 (Fla. 1973); Best Pool & Spa Service Co., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:41 pm
In the very worst murders perpetrated by not-quite-18-year-olds, the just sentence was death, but that sentence was barred by state law in many states and by Roper v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 2:40 am
In the case at bar, defendant's attorney merely stated that law office failure constitutes a reasonable excuse for defaulting but did not elaborate as to why her office failed to serve a timely answer. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm
Shortly after Riegel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:27 am
One was Fellers v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Complaints took many forms: against the superfluity of electors who lacked any deliberative functions; against the effective nullification (or “wasting”) of minority votes through winner-take-all rules; against the prospect of a contingent election in the House of Representatives, as first dramatized in 1824, which was arguably the one case that best exemplified the framers’ expectations. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
REPORT OF THE FLORIDA BAR SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES Final Report - July 2012 (background section omitted) V. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
After losing in state court, the plaintiffs filed suit in federal court, only to discover that their federal claims were barred by the full faith and credit statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Cruz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:07 am
State. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am
But because the Constitution gives Congress authority to govern non-state territories, the Supreme Court’s century-old decision in Grafton v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:00 pm
Fighting relentlessly for the best possible results for his clients. http://katzjustice.com As the Maryland Court of Appeals underlined yesterday, when a trial judge asks for grounds for an objection, state the grounds, or risk being barred from rasing the matter on appeal. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
App. 2002) (same), with Yavapai-Apache Tribe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
I previously shared my take on how the State Bar of Arizona and Niche Media proclaimed their coming educational conference. [read post]
