Search for: "Blakely v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2009, 12:33 pm
But a new Seventh Circuit decision from just last week, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Exhausting administrative remediesRoss v Blake, USSC, Docket No. 15-339This decision by the United States Supreme Court considered an appeal involving the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act [PLRA], 42 USC 1997e(a) requirement that an inmate exhaust “such administrative remedies as are available” before bringing suit. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm
Watson argues that the United States should formally repudiate the discovery doctrine set forth in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
" The Oregon Supreme Court reversed and remanded for resentencing, holding that the sentencing court–by imposing consecutive sentences based on its own findings and not based on jury findings–violated respondent’s rights under the Sixth Amendment, as construed in Apprendi and Blakely. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:57 am
The reason links to my work seeking cert in US v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:29 am
This is further reinforced by a 1994, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Fredonia State Bank, Executor of the Estate of Claytor Blake, III, et al. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:12 pm
Blake v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 12:14 pm
" Blakely v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
Greene v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 pm
Tilley; Tamiz v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:27 pm
§ 2255 asserting that a federal sentence must be corrected due to error under United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
By: Carolyn Blake Dibbert, Esq. is a post from: The Divorce Collaborative [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
"The federal court's March 31 decision in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
Charlton conciselytold the committee that in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2006, 8:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:04 am
State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would "strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
State, 716 N.E.2d 919, 933 (Ind. 1999); Angleton v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
Booker and Blakely v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
