Search for: "Board of Education v. A, C & S, INC"
Results 261 - 280
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 9:06 am
Wyeth Inc., 77 Pa. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
See Board of Airport Comm’rs of City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
See Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc., 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)--K.K. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
Over their years, they appeared at Board of Education (Board) meetings in their capacity as parents. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:31 am
Supreme Court’s employer-friendly rulings in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Education Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Hancock County Board of Education, et al.Docket: 12-13628 Opinion Date: July 12, 2013 Judge: Pryor Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law Plaintiffs, the superintendent of education and her assistant superintendent, filed suit claiming that the board and its members in both their official and individual capacities terminated the superintendent and demoted the assistant superintendent in retaliation for public comments plaintiffs… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
The warning of the overly aggressive characterization of certain arrangements as fixed indemnity coverage exempt from HIPAA and ACA mandates comes with acknowledgement that legitimate fixed indemnity coverage under a group health plan that actually meets the conditions outlined in 26 CFR 54.9831-1(c)(4), 29 CFR 732(c)(4), 45 CFR 146.145(c)(4) are exempt from the obligation to comply with the ACA and HIPAA portability mandates of title XXVI of the PHS Act, part 7 of ERISA… [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
Coverage of last week’s arguments in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:52 am
Board of Education) a constitutional irrelevance. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am
Some may find irony in the CPR’s past criticism of Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The Court, referring to its 2007 Grand Chamber judgment in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
There, as Case C 96/09 P Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Budějovický Budvar, described by the IPKat here, they were unceremoniously tossed back to the General Court for its further attention. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Therefore the Court is not being asked to provide an impermissible advisory opinion. c. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Section 4376(c) defines an applicable self-insured health plan as any plan for providing accident or health coverage if any portion of the coverage is provided other than through an insurance policy, and the plan is established or maintained by either: One or more employers for the benefit of their employees or former employees; One or more employee organizations for the benefit of their members or former members; Jointly by one or more employers and one or more employee organizations for… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
IMS Health Inc.. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
