Search for: "Boston Scientific Corp."
Results 261 - 280
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
Desmarais was a lawyer for such companies as International Business Machines Corp., GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Boston Scientific Corp., Alcatel-Lucent SA and Verizon Wireless. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:27 am
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Boston Scientific Corp., No. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
“Manufacturers include Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific Corp. and CR Bard. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Boston Scientific, 631 F.3d 762 (5th Cir. 2011) Jan Hughes was being treated for menorrhagia, or excess uterine bleeding, with a HydroThermAblator manufactured by Boston Scientific. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Boston Scientific, 631 F.3d 762 (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:59 pm
Boston Scientific Corp., 631 F.3d 762, 768 (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Boston Scientific, 751 F. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
(“Bionics”) by publicly held Boston Scientific Corp. provides a good example of the kinds of provisions that can be used to make an earnout clause more effective. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:43 am
In the instance of vaginal mesh, the agency kept passing the implants manufactured and sold by Johnson & Johnson with little to no testing, based on the product’s comparability to the ProteGen formerly made by Boston Scientific Corp which was removed from the market for safety issues. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
In the case of vaginal mesh implants, the FDA continued approving the mesh devices made by J&J and other companies based on their similarity to Boston Scientific Corp’s ProteGen even after it was pulled amid safety complaints. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 9:39 pm
That product was called ProteGen, by Boston Scientific Corp. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:36 am
” The FDA continued to approve them through its 510(k) process “based on their similarity to Boston Scientific Corp. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:12 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 561 F.3d 1319, 1325 (Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
When Cordis named Boston Scientific Corp. as one of the defendants, the company probably did not foresee itself engaging in over a decade of legal battle. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
Orange County - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed that Boston Scientific did not commit literal patent infringement of coronary stents patent owned by Cordis Corp. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:05 am
Last month Boston Scientific Corp. and American Medical Systems Holdings Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 pm
Boston Scientific Corp., 99 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:13 pm
Boston Scientific Corp., 188 F. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:19 am
Bloomberg News (9/26, Harris) reported that ”Boston Scientific Corp. [read post]
