Search for: "Brady v. State of California" Results 261 - 280 of 302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Bornhorst, No. 06-3729 "In a suit raising claims under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, and for state law malicious prosecution, defamation, and tortious interference with a prospective contract, summary judgment for defendants on all claims is reversed in part where: 1) plaintiff's arrest for murder was unsupported by probable cause, and thus defendant-prosecutor was not entitled to qualified immunity; 2) the district court erred in… [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Aguilar, 13-677, a case in which California sought to reverse the Ninth Circuit’s determination that Brady v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Sec’y for the Dep’t of Corr.); Brady challenges (Sochor v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:10 pm by Michelle Yeary
  For example, they dismiss the holding in Dvora v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:14 pm by William McGrath
The Court also rejected arguments regarding the production of documents, the ability of defendants to secure foreign documents by Letters Rogatory, or the production of documents under Brady v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:53 am by John Floyd
  In 2013, a New York federal district court in United States v. [read post]